Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:41:38PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > Is it possible, in the short term, to get a revised 2.2.17 with the > > fixed package versioning (an epoch or whatever you gotta do)? > > Well the old packages were fine as far as version monotonicity was > concerned. It was rejected because the RM thought that the epoch would > cause people too much grief (something that I don't entirely agree with). > > Is it convenient for you to wait until this weekend? Because I have a > hunch that 2.2.18 might be out soon so it may not be worthwhile spending > a whole lot of effort recompiling kernel images for all architectures > straight away. What do you think?
This weekend is ok for me -- earlier is better, but whatever. I'm going to continue to use the kernels from before. We have enough testing requirements for 2.2.18 that I couldn't really get the upload before next Monday at the earliest anyhow. > > If you'd rather just work on 2.2.18, is it possible to get an ETA for > > that? > > If you really need it straight away, I can give you a kernel source and > half of the i386 images tomorrow night my time (+1100). And if Randolph, > Brian are around, we can probably have something ready by Friday. But > as I said, it may be wise to wait until the weekend to see if there are > any developments on the 2.2.18 front. Okey. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
