Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Apr 01, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > latex2rtf stable 1.1-6 arm, m68k, powerpc
> > latex2rtf stable 1.8aa-2 alpha, i386, sparc
> > latex2rtf updates 1.8aa-4 alpha, arm, i386, sparc
> >
> > Changelog does not convince me to push it into stable:
> >
> > * Upload to stable to overcome the "can't build from source" bug that
> > breaks autobuild on some architectures.
> >
> > * Add build dependency on debhelper.
> >
> > m68k and powerpc missing
> >
> > Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Basically, the problem with -2 in stable is that there is a spurious
> .o file in the archive (and it comes from upstream).
It doesn't hurt for binary packages, I guess?
> -3 fixed this in
> unstable, and -4 fixes it in stable too. I believe that's why -2
> was never updated on m68k and powerpc for stable.
Ok, that explains it. Only because architectures are out of sync I'm
willing to let a new version in.
Regards,
Joey
--
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin
