On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 08:36:34PM -0700, David Whedon wrote: > Mon, May 28, 2001 at 11:00:24PM -0400 wrote: > > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 06:43:46PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > > > I am preparing boot-floppies 2.3.4 for release. This version should > > > be nominally installable, or at least, get beyond the blocker bugs in > > > 2.3.3, such as busybox issues causing failed download of base. > > > > I notice in the dist selection that int he code, it strictly disallows > > using sid/unstable. It pops up a box about how it is not suggested to > > use it, but then ignores the user upon answering "they don't care". Can > > we remove this? Often testing is more broken than unstable. I can modify > > it so it still pops up with the warning, but allows the user to > > continue. > > I actually completely took sid out this past weekend, have you done an update? > We've already been getting lots of bug reports from people trying to install > who > probably wanted to be using potato. I had visions of people installing sid > and > making their systems completely unbootable or corrupting their drives. I see > what > you mean about sid being better than testing sometimes, though. With a strong > warning, as long as we make sure it gets translated.
Thanks. Also, I would suggest showing the current state of things as "woody" _was_ shown as "stable" and potato was shown as "archived". Can this be updated aswell? -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
