On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:56:46PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote: > I've been thinking (always a dangerous proposition, i know :) -- we > need a better bug list. The current RC bug list includes things like > bugs that are tagged Stable or Sid, that don't really apply to the > current release-to-be. Also, it doesn't make sense to include bugs > against packages that have been removed from testing. > > I think this could help to better direct people who are interested in > getting sarge out the door. Does anyone else think this is a good idea? > > Also, how hard would it be to implement this?
The woody and sid tags are represented by the optional second [] list on the RC bug listing: S == woody T == sarge U == sid Determining which packages have been removed from testing is harder. -- Matt
