Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > If there are no objections from the exim4 maintainers, I can push -6 > > into testing, and then we can look at debootstrap again. Marc, this > > means that any changes included in -4sarge3 but not in -6 would need to > > be reuploaded to unstable once -6 goes in; which is really the case > > anyway, if those changes should be there for etch. > > Marc, can we take care of this ? > > 4.34-6 is now in both testing and unstable, however the l10n updates > you prepared for sarge are *not* in this 4.34-6 version.
I'm preparing an upload but I know Marc Haber already commited the l10n bugs I'm about to close in the exim4 CVS....so I don't want to interfere too much. AFAIK, the situation is the following: -Andreas Metzler, the maintainer is VAC -Marc Haber, co-maintainer is maybe busy (Marc I maybe make wrong assumptions) -I can prepare an upload What I propose is: I prepare this l10n-only upload and send the patch to the relevant bugs. If I don't get news from Marc or Andreas during this week-end, I upload to unstable (as the changes are made against unstable and no change needs to be kept in testing only).
