On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:17:59PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, I wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Björn Stenberg wrote: > > > They were actually hinted today, but it looks like that failed for some > > > reason. You can see it at the top of > > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt: > > > > > > Easy hint from vorlon: cln/1.1.6-1 ginac/1.1.6-1 > > > leading: cln,ginac > > > FAILED > > > > > > I might be reading it wrong, though. I suggest you mail > > > [email protected] and ask them what happened and if > > > there's anything you can do. > > > > Well then, that said, is there anything I can do to resolve this? > > Could you please push those two packages (cln/1.1.6-1 and ginac/1.1.6-1) > into testing ASAP. I have been talking to a number of Debian folks and > nobody has been able to understand what the problem is. If there is a > problem, could you please tell me what it is?! (I hereby admit: I AM TOO > DENSE TO UNDERSTAND UPDATE_OUTPUT.)
Richard, do you read debian-release? If not, it would be helpful if you had a Mail-Followup-To: header or similar saying so. I answered your question here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/debian-release-200403/msg00004.html > Those packages install fine and and fix a number of problems (documented > upstream only). If cln/1.1.6-1 makes the old ginac/1.1.5-1 uninstallable, > so what? There is the new ginac/1.1.6-1! So why the deadlock? > > (Also, if cln goes in, then the qalculate-gtk package can follow, too, at > last.) qalculate-gtk (0.3.1-2 to 0.4.1-1) Maintainer: Martin Waitz Too young, only 2 of 10 days old out of date on m68k: qalculate (from 0.3.1.1-2) Not considered Depends: qalculate-gtk cln Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
