(Diverted to -devel, as this is offtopic on -release) On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:11:31PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hello. > > The pine-docs package which I maintain contains a document called > "Getting Started With Email Using Pine", which is based on pine 3.96 > and it has not been updated since 1997.
If it is still more or less correct and useful, why remove it? I really don't see why it should be removed, being extended documentation to software distributed the same way as pine-docs is. > As the pine package which is distributed in ftp.debian.org is mainly > for people who is already familiar with pine (otherwise we would be > using free alternatives like mutt), I think it makes little sense to > keep pine-docs in the archive. Could it be removed from testing and > unstable? Why deprive pine users of documentation for their software? Familiarity with software doesn't mean one doesn't need documentation with it. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
