Sven Luther writes: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 07:53:09AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > > Based on discussions on the debian-kernel list[1], I'd like to propose > > > > that we use 2.4.27 as the 2.4 kernel for all architectures with 2.4 > > > > kernels > > > > in sarge. The strongest arguments for 2.4.27, as opposed to 2.4.26 > > > > were noted > > > > by tbm [3]. > > > > > > One thing to bear in mind when making this kind of decision it that it > > > seems to take d-i about 2 weeks to transition to a new kernel once the > > > > What are the plans regarding 2.6 ? > > It will be 2.6.8.
If you write 2.6.8, do you mean 2.6.8.1? Or is the diff to .1 included in the Debian packages? I cannot find a hint and the version number is misleading.
