On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:39:53PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I've seen that the last imagemagick was uploaded with urgency=low > even though it introduced some security fixes.
The last upload did not contain any security fixes, so the urgency setting was correct. Unfortunately I had messed up the Urgency: field in the .changes file of the 6.0.6.2-1.2 upload when I tried to be fancy about merging. > Perhaps one should consider bumping the severity of the upload (I > believe the RMs can do that) or uploading a version with a higher > urgency? I've asked for the former on IRC already. The slew of new bug reports following this new upstream version hasn't been any worse than usual. Also a quick look through the diff hasn't revealed any major flaws. So as far as I can tell, the overall bugginess of imagemagick has stayed level, and this version could just as well be pushed into sarge. Regards, Daniel.
