* David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041122 20:00]: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:48:13PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Apart from that, this suggestion is based on the assumption that the > > current problem with testing-security is due to there not being enough > > security buildd hosts for some architectures. That is not correct; the > > problem is that there is no wanna-build database, so /no/ architecture > > can build stuff for testing-security currently. > > > > AIUI, the wanna-build database does not yet exist due to technical > > difficulties. Unfortunately, however, there is not much information > > available about that subject to those not directly involved in solving > > the issue.
> Would a more widespread knowledge of wanna-build and other buildd > infrastructure help with this sort of thing in the future? It'd be great if > the > people who do understand the problem in detail could let the rest of us know > what we might do to help streamline to process so it's not a holdup for etch > too. This is happening right now. See http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/ and people.debian.org/~aba/buildd/ (I fully agree that the information status is not good enough. But - we are working on that problem.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
