On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > > > A new version of ocaml (3.09.2) is available. Since the caml libraries > > are binary-incompatible between releases, this means that we have to > > rebuild all the caml libraries before caml can hit testing. Do you see > > any problem if we start a transition to ocaml 3.09.2? > > It's not clear to me whether there would be problems. Please hold off on > starting this transition until we have a handle on which packages need to be > updated to go into etch for the X11R7 transition; I don't *think* any > ocaml-using packages are affected, but better safe than sorry.
I also don't remember any ocaml packages which where in /usr/X11R6 and co, altough we have a few packages which do depend on X (labltk, lablgtk2, etc). There is the issue of the rpath though, which is removed for some packages, but maybe not for all, and which by default sets the rpath to /usr/X11R6 stuff. Maybe we should make sure 3.09.2 has no rpath at all, or move this rpath to /usr/lib or something ? Any comment ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
