Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:04:09 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6
has caused the Debian Bug report #838234,
regarding transition: readline/readline6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
838234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload the
readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev
packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from
readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build
failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in testing for
some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch
release.
I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety. The
current state of the transition can be seen at
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 03/10/16 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html
>
> Hi,
>
> On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: [email protected]
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> readline 7.0 is now released, changing the soversion. The idea is to upload
>> the
>> readline package from experimental (plus providing the libreadline*6-dev
>> packages), and stop building the -dev packages and common packages from
>> readline6. Afaics, the API didn't change; for rebuild tests I only see build
>> failures for unrelated reasons. readline and readline6 can stay in testing
>> for
>> some time, but readline6 should be removed from testing before the stretch
>> release.
>>
>> I haven't done a test rebuild on unstable, but building on Ubuntu yakkety.
>> The
>> current state of the transition can be seen at
>> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/readline.html
>
> Sounds good. I'd prefer to see a test rebuild on sid, but I think we could go
> ahead with this as it's a separate source and shouldn't block anything.
readline6 just got removed a couple of days ago. Let's close this.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
