Your message dated Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:01:46 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#849189: mini transition: libcec
has caused the Debian Bug report #849189,
regarding mini transition: libcec
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
849189: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to update libcec in unstable to the 4.0 version because
kodi upstream switched to using it from kodi 17 beta 5. At the moment
kodi package is patched to use the older libcec 3 but this is an
undesirable divergence from upstream.
The mini transition would involve libcec and its single reverse
dependency, kodi, which I plan updating to beta6.
I'm aware of the transitions freeze but given the minimal impact and
risk of this transition I think it may get an exception.
Cheers,
Balint
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 18/01/17 16:38, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2017-01-18 0:05 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]>:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 23/12/16 12:19, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: [email protected]
>>> Usertags: transition
>>>
>>> Dear Release Team,
>>>
>>> I would like to update libcec in unstable to the 4.0 version because
>>> kodi upstream switched to using it from kodi 17 beta 5. At the moment
>>> kodi package is patched to use the older libcec 3 but this is an
>>> undesirable divergence from upstream.
>>>
>>> The mini transition would involve libcec and its single reverse
>>> dependency, kodi, which I plan updating to beta6.
>>>
>>> I'm aware of the transitions freeze but given the minimal impact and
>>> risk of this transition I think it may get an exception.
>>
>> I don't think you need a transition bug when there's just one rdep and you
>> maintain it... But sure, go ahead. I think this warrants an exception.
>
> Thanks! Usually I don't file bugs for libcec + kodi but since we are deep in
> the
> transition freeze I wanted to make sure that I perform the transition with
> Release Managers' approval.
This is finished; closing.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
