Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:07:42 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#854540: Please unblock package gitlab
has caused the Debian Bug report #854540,
regarding unblock: gitlab/8.13.11+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
854540: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gitlab
It fixes grave bug #853251 (being able to push to a repo is a
core functionality)
debdiff attached
unblock gitlab/8.13.11+dfsg-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
gitlab_8.13.11+dfsg-1.dsc..gitlab_8.13.11+dfsg-2.dsc.debdiff
Description: Binary data
signature.html
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:41:56AM +0000, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > If I read the diff right (and I'm happy to be corrected), you're patching
> > files in debian/ with a patch in debian/patches/ ? Seems an odd way to go
> > about things to me.
>
> The previous patch was incomplete and added a regression. Since upstream did
> not promise a timeline for the backport, I did the backport, but that missed
> some changes. This new patch is backported by upstream and tested to make
> sure the regression is gone.
>
Just seems an odd way to manage debian/ to me, but fine.
> > Not all of your changes have entries in debian/changelog, please be careful
> > to document them thoroghly.
>
> only lintian warnings were updated, I will be more thorough in future
> updates.
And an uploader, but ok.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
--- End Message ---
