Hi James, On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:02:16PM +0000, James Cowgill wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:11:44 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Moarkus, hi Emilio, > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:50:34PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > On 16.02.2017 22:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > > > On 16/02/17 06:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > >> Package: release.debian.org > > > >> Severity: normal > > > >> User: [email protected] > > > >> Usertags: unblock > > > >> > > > >> Hi > > > >> > > > >> Please unblock package spice > > > [...] > > > > That failed to build on mips(64)el: > > > > > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=spice > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think this is unrelated to our security fix. The package already > > > failed on mips64el last month (2017/01/06) with the same build failure. > > > > FTR, yes I think this is true, that the failure is *not* related to > > the security fixes. I built both 0.12.8-2 and 0.12.8-2.1 on eller.d.o, > > and it failed both there. I have not futher investigated. > > The build failure was caused by the lesser form of the binutils bug > (#844227 - scroll to the bottom) which has just been fixed. I rebuilt > spice with an extra-depends on binutils and it now builds ok.
Thanks for the analysis! Regards, Salvatore
