Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:25:48 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: RM: willow/0.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #856113,
regarding RM: willow/0.3.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
856113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm

The willow source package contains image files which include an embedded ICC
profile which is in breach of the DFSG (see Bug #852943).

This has been fixed in unstable (0.3.1+dfsg-1), however the unstable version 
also includes some other minor changes.

Probably the simplest solution is to remove willow from testing (it has no 
reverse dependancies)?

Thanks.

Christopher Hoskin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:05:13AM +0000, Christopher Hoskin wrote:
> The willow source package contains image files which include an embedded ICC
> profile which is in breach of the DFSG (see Bug #852943).
> 
> This has been fixed in unstable (0.3.1+dfsg-1), however the unstable version 
> also includes some other minor changes.
> 
> Probably the simplest solution is to remove willow from testing (it has no 
> reverse dependancies)?

Remove hint added.

Cheers,

Ivo

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to