Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:51:07 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#857574: 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
has caused the Debian Bug report #857574,
regarding unblock: influxdb/1.1.1+dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
857574: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857574
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock influxdb 1.1.1+dfsg1-4. If fixes #850282 which caused
occasional FTBFS.
The tests were failing due to an unstable test which was disabled.
I have attached the debdiff to this email.
unblock influxdb/1.1.1+dfsg1-4
Cheers,
--
Alexandre Viau
[email protected]
diff -Nru influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog
influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2016-12-22 00:50:08.000000000
-0500
+++ influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2017-02-28 18:20:09.000000000
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+influxdb (1.1.1+dfsg1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Disable TestEngine_Backup. (Closes: #850282)
+ * Re-enable i386 tests.
+
+ -- Alexandre Viau <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:20:09 -0500
+
+influxdb (1.1.1+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Disable tests on i386 (Closes: #850282)
+
+ -- Alexandre Viau <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:24:05 -0500
+
influxdb (1.1.1+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Lintian overrides.
diff -Nru influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/disable_testengine_backup.patch
influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/disable_testengine_backup.patch
--- influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/disable_testengine_backup.patch
1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/disable_testengine_backup.patch
2017-02-28 18:20:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Description: Disable unstable test
+Bug: 850282
+Author: Alexandre Viau <[email protected]>
+
+--- a/tsdb/engine/tsm1/engine_test.go
++++ b/tsdb/engine/tsm1/engine_test.go
+@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@
+
+ // Ensure that the engine will backup any TSM files created since the passed
in time
+ func TestEngine_Backup(t *testing.T) {
++ t.Skip()
+ // Generate temporary file.
+ f, _ := ioutil.TempFile("", "tsm")
+ f.Close()
diff -Nru influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/series
influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/series
--- influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/series 2016-12-22 00:50:08.000000000
-0500
+++ influxdb-1.1.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/series 2017-02-28 18:20:09.000000000
-0500
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
+disable_testengine_backup.patch
disable-reporting.patch
jwt-v2.patch
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/03/17 04:33 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 04:17:17PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
>> I have noticed that 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
>
> It is?
Sorry, I mean testing.
>> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
>> can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
>
> Becuase you didn't fix the build failure of 1.1.1+dfsg1-1 and
> 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 quickly enough, like, in December when they happened, and
> instead waited for the bug to raised to RC in end January and then
> fixing it at end February.
That wasn't my question. I always thought that if 1.1.1 was in the
"testing" column, it meant that it was available in "testing".
Can you explain why 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 is in the testing column and
1.1.1+dfsg1-4 in the "unstable" column?
1.1.1 is not in testing nor in unstable. So what does it mean?
> Please check the build status of the package you upload more frequently.
Oh, I saw it. I just needed to find time to make the upload.
>> Anyways, can we still get it unblocked? It contains various fixes that
>> would be a great addition for Stretch.
>
> Not from the release team, but the diff is pretty huge..
> 180 files changed, 12629 insertions(+), 4277 deletions(-)
Alright, thats okay. I'll close this.
>> If not, feel free to close this as the bug that this would have fixed
>> isn't even in stable.
>
> What's the deal with stable here??
Sorry, I meant testing again here. I definitely wrote that mail too fast.
> BTW, this URL can be shortened to just
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=aviau
Ah nice! Thanks for the tip.
Cheers,
--
Alexandre Viau
[email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
