On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 08:57:00PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > Alexandre Viau: > >>> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually > >>> can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column? > >> Becuase you didn't fix the build failure of 1.1.1+dfsg1-1 and > >> 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 quickly enough, like, in December when they happened, and > >> instead waited for the bug to raised to RC in end January and then > >> fixing it at end February. > > That wasn't my question. I always thought that if 1.1.1 was in the > > "testing" column, it meant that it was available in "testing". > > > > Can you explain why 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 is in the testing column and > > 1.1.1+dfsg1-4 in the "unstable" column? > > > > 1.1.1 is not in testing nor in unstable. So what does it mean? > > > > It could be due to "Built-Using" - if your package is mentioned in a > "Built-Using" field, dak will ensure that the source package is present > in the relevant suites. This can create the effect that a source "is in > testing" without really being so.
mattia@warren ~ % cat
/var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_source_Sources |
grep-dctrl -S influxdb -X -sPackage,Version,Extra-Source-Only
Package: influxdb
Version: 1.0.2+dfsg1-1
Package: influxdb
Version: 1.1.1+dfsg1-2
Extra-Source-Only: yes
mattia@warren ~ %
i.e. yes, a case of ESO.
> If this is the case, then it suggests that the QA page still does not
> properly ignore source packages with the "Extra-Source-Only" field (or
> whatever it is called).
so it seems.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
