Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Antoine Musso reported #861656, and claims it is RC. To adress it, he > suggested upgrading to upstream release 0.4.12. I checked the diff, > which I attached to this mail. If removing the tests, then the change > are very small. I have therefore attached 2 diff: one with only the > change to the library code, and one diff containing all the changes > between 0.4.11 and 0.4.12. > > At this point, would the release team accept an upgrade to upstream > version 0.4.12?
> Do you agree than #861656 should be considered RC? I am not convinced, and it sounds from the bug like you are not either. Given that you only asked the reporter for clarification today, let's see where that leads first. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected] Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
