Your message dated Sun, 21 May 2017 17:48:54 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#862941: binNMUs needed for multiple arm64 packages
(#850814)
has caused the Debian Bug report #862941,
regarding binNMUs needed for multiple arm64 packages (#850814)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
862941: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862941
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Hey folks,
As first discussed a while back, we've had a bug in gold which caused
some broken builds of some arm64 packages. These were mostly in
backports, with a few example in the early life of stretch. Now that
#850814 is fixed and we have an updated binutils in stable too, I've
re-scanned the archive for arm64 binaries with broken alignment. Please
binNMU the following (I hope I got the syntax right!):
Backports:
nmu haskell-cabal_1.22.4.0-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-hierarchical-clustering_0.4.6-1~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports
-m "Rebuild with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-http_4000.2.20-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-mtl_2.2.1-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with
fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-network_2.6.2.1-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-network-uri_2.6.0.3-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m
"Rebuild with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-old-locale_1.0.0.7-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m
"Rebuild with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-old-time_1.1.0.3-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-parsec_3.1.9-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-prettyclass_1.0.0.0-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m
"Rebuild with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-random_1.1-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with
fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-stm_2.4.4-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with
fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-text_1.2.1.3-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu haskell-zlib_0.5.4.2-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
nmu systemd_230-7~bpo8+2 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed
binutils"
nmu wine-development_2.0.3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild
with fixed binutils"
Unstable:
nmu wine-development_2.0.3 . arm64 . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils"
Experimental:
nmu wine-development_2.8-1 . arm64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild with fixed
binutils"
nmu wine-2.0.1-1 . arm64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils"
I'm *guessing* all the Haskell packages might involve triggering more
rebuild of all the rdeps too, not sure...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.8
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 01:41:57 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> OK. All scheduled. (couple of version typos sorted)
>
Closing.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
