Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:41:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#864383: unblock: libp11-openssl1.1/0.4.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #864383,
regarding unblock: libp11-openssl1.1/0.4.4-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
864383: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864383
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libp11-openssl1.1
This is a new package which is adds only pkcs11 engine support for openssl 1.1.
Without this the change it can't be used with openssl 1.1 only with openssl
1.0.2 and since the openssl command is coming from 1.1 without this it would
be a functionality regression in stretch.
Full context in #846548.
No debdiff since this is a new package.
unblock libp11-openssl1.1/0.4.4-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64
(x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:01:00 -0300 Julien Cristau <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 04:45 PM, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package libp11-openssl1.1
> >
> > This is a new package which is adds only pkcs11 engine support for openssl
> > 1.1.
> > Without this the change it can't be used with openssl 1.1 only with openssl
> > 1.0.2 and since the openssl command is coming from 1.1 without this it
> > would
> > be a functionality regression in stretch.
> >
> > Full context in #846548.
> >
> Unblocked, with a 3-day delay so anyone can still object or amend.
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
>
>
Migrated, so this can now be closed. :)
~Niels
--- End Message ---
