Control: tags -1 pending On 25/06/17 13:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> FTR: >>> >>> >From 2017-05-29: >>> >>> 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already >>> plan what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get >>> a ACK for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after >>> the release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;) >>> 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds. >>> 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - >>> https://bugs.debian.org/862189 >>> 12:39 < pochu> ack >>> 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :) >>> >>> So uploaded now. >>> >>> firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway. >>> >>> As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release >>> said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the >>> bin-NMU. >> >> binNMUs scheduled, excluding firefox (bd-uninst) firefox-esr (was waiting >> for it >> to migrate, I'll binNMU it at some point) and libreoffice. > > firefox-esr migrated, and now has a maintainer upload so hopefully won't > need a binNMU. It does not yet build though, because it depends on an > unavailable version of libsqlite (so we'll possibly need to transition that > when it happens, to unblock this one). > > Or we could do removals, but that feels a bit ew.
Given hunspell already migrated to testing, this is not blocking anything, so there's no rush to get it finished. Thus there's no need to remove firefox-esr (plus any rdeps). This should just sort itself out in due time. Cheers, Emilio
