On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 16:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Hi, > > On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 06:07 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> (2017-07-01): > > > src:linux-latest builds meta-packages depending on debug info packages > > > built from src:linux. During the stretch release cycle, these were > > > changed to new-style dbgsym packages and then this change was reverted > > > to src:linux. However, the change in src:linux-latest was *not* > > > reverted, leaving these meta-packages uninstallable. [...] > -Section: debug > -Priority: extra > > Should the -dbg packages not still be in the "debug" section? > > Is it intentional that there are still some dbgsym packages built by > src:linux? Specifically: > > hyperv-daemons-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, i386 > libcpupower1-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, > armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > linux-cpupower-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, i386 > linux-kbuild-4.9-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, > armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > linux-perf-4.9-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, > armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > usbip-dbgsym | 2.0+4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, > armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
Ping, both on the above questions and the upload. If this is going to make it into 9.1, it needs to be uploaded _and through NEW_ by the weekend. Regards, Adam
