Hi! On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:16:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2017-07-16 at 18:41 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:19:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > > > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 19:12 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > some minor security fixes for libquicktime, identical to what's > > > > already in unstable and also tested with reverse deps on stretch. > > > > > > > > If it's too late for 9.1, 9.2 is also just fine. > > > > > > Feel free to upload, we'll see if it makes it in time. > > > > Thanks, uploaded. > > Unfortunately, I've had to flag the upload for rejection - it's somehow > picked up a new dependency on "libschroedinger-1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0)", but > that binary package is not in stretch.
Hmm, could it be the building chroot was unclean (contained jessie packages? Because I see libschroedinger-1.0-0 only in jessie/oldstable). I took jmm's debdiff, and rebuilded in stretch and as well the debdiff against the resulting binary packages and those in the archive looked okay. I thus just re-uploaded Moritz's package. Hope that was fine (and in the interest of the fixes getting into 9.1). Regards, Salvatore
