On September 24, 2017 9:29:21 AM EDT, Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> wrote: >Control: tag -1 pending > >On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 01:57:30PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Saturday, September 23, 2017 05:00:48 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:48:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > > On Saturday, September 09, 2017 04:45:34 PM Julien Cristau wrote: >> > > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo >> > > > >> > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 20:43:55 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > > > > Thanks to me not understanding some things about systemd >service files >> > > > > and >> > > > > how they interacted with opendkim (and incomplete testing on >my part), >> > > > > the >> > > > > package, as released for stretch, is pretty non-functional. >> > > > >> > > > Is there a risk of setups where things currently work in >stretch but >> > > > won't after these changes? Or where the update ends up with >opendkim >> > > > running as root, say because the service file gets updated but >> > > > opendkim.conf doesn't? This might be worth a note in >NEWS.Debian to >> > > > give people a chance to double check? >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Julien >> > > >> > > Good point. Revised debdiff attached. How about this? >> > > >> > > Scott K >> > >> > Looks good to me, please go ahead. >> > >> > Thanks, >> >> Thanks. Uploaded. > >Flagged for acceptance. Lintian warns of a spelling error in the news >file, but not one I'm too worried about unless you're very keen to fix >it. > >Thanks,
I'm not very keen to fix it. Thanks, Scott K
