On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick > Control: severity -1 normal > > On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the >> ABI. >> Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... >> >> Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ >> >> I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it >> was fine. >> >> I will fix ASAP the problems. > > What problems? > > FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental
Smell like a compiler bug :S > >> I have set the severity to important because I will prefer to get quickly a >> newer imagemagick version due to the number of security bug to backport > > Don't do that, and please use reportbug to get the necessary usertags. > > Cheers, > Emilio