On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 17:30 +0000, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Adam, > > > > What am I missing? :) > > #857855, which was RC at the time and (at least according to the > > metadata) a regression relative to the package that was already in > > stretch. > > Huh, okay. Can you recommend the best way forward at this point? Mark > the bug as notfound in the stretch version?
#857855 is already marked as not affecting the package in stretch - that's why it was an issue for the original unblock. > Do I need to re-upload? If you want to fix #857746 in stretch (which I assume is the overall goal) then yes, that'll need to go through proposed-updates with a release.d.o p-u bug as usual. We can't make a version of redis that was superseded nearly a year ago appear in stretch otherwise. Regards, Adam
