On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 14:42 +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote: > Hi, > > Am 31.03.2018 um 23:34 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > It's unclear to me that this actually affects stretch in any > > meaningful > > way. > > > > While the version tracking information does include the stretch > > version > > in the "found" list, the bug is tagged "buster sid". From reading > > the > > bug log, it looks like this is because the issue only occurs when > > using > > GCC 7, which is not present in stretch. > > that is definitely incorrect. Work colleagues of mine ran into this > bug on plain Stretch systems, and it disappeared when using the > patched boost packages I provided. > > I cannot share the code because that's privileged information, but > you can take my word for it. I am already providing the patched > packages to dozens of machines via a local repository. >
Andreas - you tagged #883987 as "buster sid" despite the version tracking implying that stretch was affected. Do you remember the details as to why? Regards, Adam
