Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:41:38 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#892505: transition: openexr
has caused the Debian Bug report #892505,
regarding transition: openexr
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
892505: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892505
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Dear Release Team,
I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package.
On March 8, 2018 a fixed testing-purpose package (2.2.1-2) has been
uploaded to experimental.
So, following the auto-openexr checklist[1], here is the list of source
packages depending on openexr and the results of the test builds
(honoring the dependency levels as reported in the checklist, as
relevant for the correct order):
### Dependency level 2 ###
* aqsis_1.8.2-8 => OK
* darktable_2.4.0-1 => OK
* exactimage_1.0.1-1 => OK
* freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-5 => OK
* gegl_0.3.28-2 => OK
* imagemagick_8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3 => OK
* kde-runtime_4:17.08.3-1 => OK
* kimageformats_5.42.0-2 => OK
* kio-extras_4:17.08.3-2 => OK
* krita_1:3.3.3+dfsg-1 => OK
* libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-5 => OK
* luminance-hdr_2.5.1+dfsg-3 => OK
* mia_2.4.6-2 => OK
* nvidia-texture-tools_2.0.8-1+dfsg-8.1 => OK
* opencv_3.2.0+dfsg-4 => OK
* openexr-viewers_1.0.1-6 => OK
* openvdb_5.0.0-1 => OK
* povray_1:3.7.0.4-2 => OK
### Dependency level 3 ###
* gmic_1.7.9+zart-4 => FTBFS (not openexr related)
* gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.8.3-1 => FTBFS (not openexr related)
* hugin_2018.0.0+dfsg-1 => OK
* k3d_0.8.0.6-6 => OK
* openimageio_1.8.9~dfsg0-1 => OK
* pfstools_2.1.0-3 => OK
* synfig_1.0.2-1 => OK
* vips_8.4.5-1 => FTBFS (not openexr related)
### Dependency level 4 ###
blender_2.79+dfsg0-3 => OK
Thanks for your time and patience.
mfv
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openexr.html
Ben file:
title = "openexr";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenexr22" | .depends ~ "libopenexr23";
is_good = .depends ~ "libopenexr23";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libopenexr22";
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers buildd-unstable
APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2018-03-11 at 13:38 (+0100), Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2018-03-11 at 00:33 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Good, that means this can be a 'smooth' transition, i.e. the new library
>> package
>> can migrate while keeping the old one in testing at the same time, so the two
>> packages that fail to build are not really blockers (they are in order to
>> finish
>> the transition, but they are not in order to move the rest of the packages to
>> testing). Thus please go ahead.
>
> Uploaded. Thanks.
The transition has completed already.
Thus, closing (as requested by Emilio on IRC).
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
