On 09/10/2018 16:36, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2018-10-05 17:30] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> >> On 04/10/2018 03:40, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> [2018-10-02 09:38] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> >>>> part text/plain 567 >>>> On 11/08/2018 09:40, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>> Severity: normal >>>>> User: [email protected] >>>>> Usertags: transition >>>>> >>>>> Hello. According to [1] I request approval of upload gdbm-1.17 into >>>>> unstable. It will affect 28 packages, 26 of which build cleanly >>>>> (no-changes source upload will be required) and I am ready to NMU >>>>> patches for two others (perl and qsf). >>> >>>> Is perl still unfixed? With the upcoming perl transition, that's >>>> something th at I wouldn't like to see fixed through an NMU at this >>>> point. >>> >>> No, according to #904005, Perl maintainer fixed this issue himself. >>> Only qsf left {no response from maintainer, will NMU}. >> >> Let's do this now. > > Uploaded to unstable. binNMU is automatic, correct?
Not automatic, no. I'll schedule them when gdbm has built everywhere. Cheers, Emilio
