Your message dated Sat, 5 Jan 2019 11:46:43 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#915811: nmu: pocl_1.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #915811,
regarding nmu: pocl_1.1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
915811: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915811
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu pocl_1.1-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with latest gcc to collect symbol
updates."
These rebuilds will fail due to changed symbols ... which is a bit
strange since the package was already built with gcc-8.
Such symbol changes could affect other packages as well.
e.g. on amd64
- _ZTISt19_Sp_make_shared_tag@Base 0.10
+ _ZZNSt19_Sp_make_shared_tag5_S_tiEvE5__tag@Base 1.1-7
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 04/01/2019 17:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2019-01-04 10:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On 07/12/2018 01:21, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: [email protected]
>>> Usertags: binnmu
>>>
>>> nmu pocl_1.1-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with latest gcc to collect
>>> symbol updates."
>>>
>>> These rebuilds will fail due to changed symbols ... which is a bit
>>> strange since the package was already built with gcc-8.
>>> Such symbol changes could affect other packages as well.
>>
>> If the rebuilds will fail, how's a binNMU going to help? If you meant
>> something
>> else by 'these rebuilds will fail', then now there is #916024 so I suppose a
>> binNMU is no longer appropriate in any case.
>
> The binNMUs will fail, but the build logs will contain the symbol
> information updates needed to fix #916024. I'll follow up with a
> sourceful upload, not two.
Fair enough. Scheduled.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
