Control: tags -1 confirmed On 08/01/2019 11:15, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: [email protected] > Usertags: transition > > Hi Release Team, > > We'd like to transition to Pacemaker 2. The ben file below is mostly > equivalent to that of auto-pacemaker, but misses pacemaker-dev, because > I'm not sure how to handle that. The current lib*-dev packages are > becoming transitional, depending on pacemaker-dev which is a union of > them. > > The dlm package will also need a rebuild, because it dlopens libstonithd > and embeds its SONAME at build time. Is there a way to represent this > in the tracker? Anyway, I'm asking upstream for a new release, and will > do a sourceful upload once that happens (latest). Would adding a > Recommends: libstonithdX let the auto tracker pick up this weak > dependency?
No, unless the tracker had a .recommends in is_affected etc. > We expect sbd to break with the new Pacemaker libraries, and will handle > this with sourceful uploads. > > I don't know of any other dependencies, this should be a very shallow > transition despite all the library packages taking part. Please let me > know when I can upload Pacemaker 2 to unstable. Since you are taking care of the two rdeps, go ahead. Emilio
