On 13/01/2019 23:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > El 13/1/19 a les 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: >> On 11/01/2019 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Control: tags -1 confirmed >>> >>> On 11/01/2019 15:17, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>>> Subject: transition: ode >>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>> User: [email protected] >>>> Usertags: transition >>>> Severity: normal >>>> >>>> Dear release team, >>>> >>>> I would like to ask a transition slot for the ode library. Upstream >>>> published a >>>> new version with a soname bump. The affected packages can be build without >>>> any >>>> problem with the new version (I did it in an pbuilder environment). >>>> >>>> Please accept with transition slot. I know that is too close to Buster >>>> freeze. >>> >>> Go ahead. >> >> And your package fails (and was already failing) to build on several release >> architectures. You should have fixed that before requesting a transition >> slot. >> >> Please look at those failures: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ode >> > > First of all I'm so sorry. I didn't check the build of the package > because I thought that it was built. I was more worried about the > dependencies than the package itself. Upstream told me the there was no > important changes. I check specially ABI changes. > > In any case, after I notice the problem I worked on. In some archs there > was a problem in autotest, and in others an assert that for an check > from upstream. The problem was in non common archs. > > I pushed a new version of the package yesterday night solving the issue > in some archs and this morning I have pushed another version of the > package with the patches sent by upstream. Also, some people in > #debian-mentors helped me in this issue. > > Now, it builds in all the archs expect ia64 because some dependencies, > not the package itself.
Thanks for the prompt fix. binNMUs scheduled. Cheers, Emilio
