Your message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:22:56 +0100 with message-id <57c50a5e-b831-be5f-5a4c-5a15aa275...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#921958: nmu: why3_1.1.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #921958, regarding nmu: why3_1.1.1-4 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 921958: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921958 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-CC: Benjamin Barenblat <bba...@debian.org> nmu why3_1.1.1-4 . mips64el . unstable . -m "rebuild against coq 8.9.0" this blocks why3 and coq from migrating. Thanks in advance -Ralf. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 10/02/2019 16:27, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > X-Debbugs-CC: Benjamin Barenblat <bba...@debian.org> > > nmu why3_1.1.1-4 . mips64el . unstable . -m "rebuild against coq 8.9.0" > > this blocks why3 and coq from migrating. Thanks in advance -Ralf. Done, also on kfreebsd. The coq ocaml bindings changed the ABI as well, which prevent coq from migrating: trying: coq skipped: coq (0, 1, 99) got: 28+0: a-1:a-0:a-0:a-0:i-20:m-1:m-0:m-5:p-0:s-1 * mipsel: libaac-tactics-ocaml, libaac-tactics-ocaml-dev, libssreflect-ocaml, libssreflect-ocaml-dev (this is not mipsel specific). I have scheduled the required ocaml binNMUs to solve this. Emilio
--- End Message ---
