Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 18:56:14 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#923797: unblock: pyres/1.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #923797,
regarding unblock: pyres/1.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
923797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Could you, please, unblock pyres and remotecv?
The new pyres version closes #917658.
diff -Nru pyres-1.5/debian/changelog pyres-1.5/debian/changelog
--- pyres-1.5/debian/changelog 2017-09-07 23:14:28.000000000 -0300
+++ pyres-1.5/debian/changelog 2019-03-04 15:28:30.000000000 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+pyres (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ [ Ondřej Nový ]
+
+ * d/control: Set Vcs-* to salsa.debian.org
+ * d/control: Remove ancient X-Python-Version field
+
+ [ Marcelo Jorge Vieira]
+
+ * AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'iteritems' (Closes:
#917658)
+
+ -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira <[email protected]> Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:28:30
-0300
+
pyres (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Gilles Dubuc ]
diff -Nru pyres-1.5/debian/control pyres-1.5/debian/control
--- pyres-1.5/debian/control 2017-09-07 23:14:28.000000000 -0300
+++ pyres-1.5/debian/control 2019-03-04 15:26:38.000000000 -0300
@@ -15,10 +15,9 @@
python-setuptools,
python-simplejson,
redis-server
-X-Python-Version: >= 2.7
Homepage: https://github.com/binarydud/pyres
-Vcs-Git:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/pyres.git
-Vcs-Browser:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/pyres.git
+Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pyres.git
+Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pyres
Package: python-pyres
Architecture: all
diff -Nru pyres-1.5/debian/copyright pyres-1.5/debian/copyright
--- pyres-1.5/debian/copyright 2017-09-07 23:14:10.000000000 -0300
+++ pyres-1.5/debian/copyright 2019-03-04 15:26:38.000000000 -0300
@@ -74,4 +74,3 @@
CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR
OTHERWISE)
ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS THEME, EVEN IF ADVISED OF
THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
-
diff -Nru pyres-1.5/debian/patches/redis_3.patch pyres-
1.5/debian/patches/redis_3.patch
--- pyres-1.5/debian/patches/redis_3.patch 1969-12-31
21:00:00.000000000 -0300
+++ pyres-1.5/debian/patches/redis_3.patch 2019-03-04
15:27:28.000000000 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- a/pyres/__init__.py
++++ b/pyres/__init__.py
+@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@
+ def delayed_push(self, datetime, item):
+ key = int(time.mktime(datetime.timetuple()))
+ self.redis.rpush('resque:delayed:%s' % key,
ResQ.encode(item))
+- self.redis.zadd('resque:delayed_queue_schedule', key, key)
++ self.redis.zadd('resque:delayed_queue_schedule', {key: key})
+
+ def delayed_queue_peek(self, start, count):
+ return [int(item) for item in self.redis.zrange(
diff -Nru pyres-1.5/debian/patches/series pyres-
1.5/debian/patches/series
--- pyres-1.5/debian/patches/series 1969-12-31 21:00:00.000000000
-0300
+++ pyres-1.5/debian/patches/series 2019-03-04 15:27:28.000000000
-0300
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+redis_3.patch
Cheers,
--
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
xmpp:[email protected]
http://metaldot.alucinados.com
http://movimente.me
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 923797 wontfix
thanks
Hi Marcelo,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:29:00 +0100 Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote:
> So you missed the soft freeze (like loads of other packages). The soft
> freeze is there for a reason, we try to prevent surprises while we are
> preparing for the release of buster. You didn't act on that FTBFS bug
> (or at least didn't show it) until two days ago. I am asking my question
> again, try to answer it differently this time: Can you please elaborate
> why you think we should grant your package an exception, assuming that
> we don't know what pyres is?
I am closing this bug now as it is getting too late for new packages.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
