Control: tags -1 moreinfo Eduard Bloch: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: [email protected] > Usertags: unblock > > Please advise how to process with a required fix for the package > apt-cacher-ng. > > The change is a one-liner and solves the bug #928957. Without it, the > cache cleanup will fail for a lot of people in the next couple of years. > But it touches the upstream source, that's why I would like to release > it as minor upstream version (3.2.1, currently 3.2, and I am the > upstream). > > I remember how you handled a similar request of mine a couple of years > ago, and this time I DEMAND a proper response here before I upload > anything. Please don't ignore it again for weeks and don't tell me that > this change is impossible to understand or to estimate WRT consequences; > it is using an already existing interface in the exact usecase it was > designed for. (see below) > > Best regards, > Eduard. > > [...] Hi Eduard,
I acknowledge that you were not happy with our handling of your previous unblock request for apt-cacher-ng about two releases ago. However, I do not feel this request/email - i.e. the third paragraph of it - is a productive nor a professional way to go about it. I will refuse to consider this request at its current tone, but I am willing to review one written in a professional manner. Thanks, ~Niels
