Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2019 20:06:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#929012: unblock: base-files/10.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929012,
regarding unblock: base-files/10.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
929012: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929012
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock base-files. Debdiff is below.
Note: It would be good to unblock debian-security-support first (#928972),
or at the same time, because base-files Breaks the version currently
in testing.
Thanks.
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/debian/changelog base-files-10.3/debian/changelog
--- base-files-10.1/debian/changelog 2018-01-14 00:36:34.000000000 +0100
+++ base-files-10.3/debian/changelog 2019-05-13 22:25:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+base-files (10.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add Breaks: debian-security-support (<< 2019.04.25). Closes: #928172.
+ This is the first version of debian-security-support which does not break
+ when /etc/debian_version contains a string in the form "10.x".
+
+ -- Santiago Vila <[email protected]> Mon, 13 May 2019 22:25:32 +0200
+
+base-files (10.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Release candidate for buster as stable:
+ - Use "10" as version in /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net.
+ (never expected to change after buster is released)
+ - Use 10.0 as version in /etc/debian_version.
+ (expected to change at every point release)
+ - Change PRETTY_NAME in /usr/lib/os-release, adding 10 as version number
+ and "(buster)" as codename. Add also VERSION_ID and VERSION.
+ (never expected to change)
+ - Add VERSION_CODENAME to os-release. Closes: #829245. This is optional
+ according to the specs but some people find it useful. Please note that
+ for now this is only expected to be present on stable releases.
+ - Update README (buster -> bullseye).
+
+ -- Santiago Vila <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:05:00 +0200
+
base-files (10.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses. Closes: #859649, #882628.
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/debian/control base-files-10.3/debian/control
--- base-files-10.1/debian/control 2018-01-13 23:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ base-files-10.3/debian/control 2019-05-13 21:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
Essential: yes
Priority: required
Replaces: base, miscutils, dpkg (<= 1.15.0)
-Breaks: initscripts (<< 2.88dsf-13.3), sendfile (<< 2.1b.20080616-5.2~)
+Breaks: debian-security-support (<< 2019.04.25), initscripts (<<
2.88dsf-13.3), sendfile (<< 2.1b.20080616-5.2~)
Multi-Arch: foreign
Description: Debian base system miscellaneous files
This package contains the basic filesystem hierarchy of a Debian system, and
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/debian/README base-files-10.3/debian/README
--- base-files-10.1/debian/README 2018-01-13 23:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ base-files-10.3/debian/README 2019-05-13 21:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
* Questions about /etc/issue and /etc/debian_version:
Q. I upgraded my system to the testing distribution and now my /etc/issue
-says "buster/sid". Should it not read "buster" or "testing"?
+says "bullseye/sid". Should it not read "bullseye" or "testing"?
Q. I upgraded my system to the unstable distribution and now my /etc/issue
-says "buster/sid". Should it not read "sid" or "unstable"?
+says "bullseye/sid". Should it not read "sid" or "unstable"?
A. That would be nice, but it is not possible because of the way the
testing distribution works. Packages uploaded for unstable reach
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@
two sides of the same coin. Since the base-files package in testing
was initially uploaded for unstable, the only sensible /etc/issue to
have is one that is both valid for testing and unstable, hence
-"buster/sid" (or whatever is appropriate).
+"bullseye/sid" (or whatever is appropriate).
-Q. Why "buster/sid" and not "testing/unstable" as it used to be?
+Q. Why "bullseye/sid" and not "testing/unstable" as it used to be?
A. The codename is a little bit more informative, as the meaning of
"testing" changes over time.
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
your /etc/apt/sources.list file is probably a much better way.
Q. There is a new point release and I've just upgraded my system.
-The /etc/debian_version file now says 8.x but /etc/issue still says 8.
+The /etc/debian_version file now says 10.x but /etc/issue still says 10.
Is this ok?
A. Yes. The release managers asked me not to touch /etc/issue, as that's
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/etc/debian_version base-files-10.3/etc/debian_version
--- base-files-10.1/etc/debian_version 2017-06-26 00:18:00.000000000 +0200
+++ base-files-10.3/etc/debian_version 2019-04-19 13:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-buster/sid
+10.0
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/etc/issue base-files-10.3/etc/issue
--- base-files-10.1/etc/issue 2017-06-26 00:18:00.000000000 +0200
+++ base-files-10.3/etc/issue 2019-04-19 13:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-Debian #OSNAME# buster/sid \n \l
+Debian #OSNAME# 10 \n \l
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/etc/issue.net base-files-10.3/etc/issue.net
--- base-files-10.1/etc/issue.net 2017-06-26 00:18:00.000000000 +0200
+++ base-files-10.3/etc/issue.net 2019-04-19 13:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Debian #OSNAME# buster/sid
+Debian #OSNAME# 10
diff -Nru base-files-10.1/etc/os-release base-files-10.3/etc/os-release
--- base-files-10.1/etc/os-release 2017-06-26 00:18:00.000000000 +0200
+++ base-files-10.3/etc/os-release 2019-04-19 13:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-PRETTY_NAME="Debian #OSNAME# buster/sid"
+PRETTY_NAME="Debian #OSNAME# 10 (buster)"
NAME="Debian #OSNAME#"
+VERSION_ID="10"
+VERSION="10 (buster)"
+VERSION_CODENAME=buster
ID=debian
HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/";
SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Santiago Vila:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock base-files. Debdiff is below.
>
> Note: It would be good to unblock debian-security-support first (#928972),
> or at the same time, because base-files Breaks the version currently
> in testing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [...]
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
