Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2019 17:51:03 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#930951: nmu: libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #930951,
regarding nmu: libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.36
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
930951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Please binnmu libapt-pkg-perl on amd64. The package uploaded by the
maintainer depends on libapt-pkg5.90, which is only available in
experimental.
nmu libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.36 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid
environment."
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 02:10:06PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Please binnmu libapt-pkg-perl on amd64. The package uploaded by the
> maintainer depends on libapt-pkg5.90, which is only available in
> experimental.
>
> nmu libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.36 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid
> environment."
Scheduled; thanks. In fact I wonder if I should schedule for all arches so
that the version number is the same, but I don't remember the precedent for
that so I have not at this time.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
--- End Message ---
