On 25.10.19 18:09, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:59:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK, thanks, reassigning to src:gcc-9 (libstdc++6 for now) then.
no. based on what rationale?
And to prevent said gcc-9 version from migrating, to not break something
else (no idea whether it does, but..).
The Release Team asked me exactly this: to reassign the bug to gcc-9.
base on what rationale?
> As can be seen on [1], the autopkgtests started failing this Monday and
> succeeded only once since then.
At this time, there was no new gcc-9 in the archive, -9 was on the archive on
Oct 8, -10 and -11 are ftbfs, and -12 was uploaded on Oct 23, but you say that
the tests started failing on Oct 21. So why do you think this is related to gcc-9?
