Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 13:17 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197 > > asking to include information about minor version somewhere in > /etc/os-release. > > I first said "not yet" because we were very close to the release of > buster and the behaviour of /etc/debian_version and /etc/os-release > was already "documented" or "announced" in base-files changelog, as > usual. My plan was to consider that for bullseye. > > However, there is a glitch in lsb-release: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939733 > > We could revert the change in lsb-release so that it looks at > /etc/debian_version again, but we could also do the change > in base-files now and fix this glitch in the most standard way. > > So: Would you approve that base-files 10.3+deb10u2 for Debian 10.2 > has VERSION_ID="10.2" in /etc/os-release (and 10.x from now on) > instead of "10"?
To confirm, is the proposal to end up with: PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)" NAME="Debian GNU/Linux" VERSION_ID="10.2" VERSION="10 (buster)" ? Regards, Adam
