Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 13:17 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197
> 
> asking to include information about minor version somewhere in
> /etc/os-release.
> 
> I first said "not yet" because we were very close to the release of
> buster and the behaviour of /etc/debian_version and /etc/os-release
> was already "documented" or "announced" in base-files changelog, as
> usual. My plan was to consider that for bullseye.
> 
> However, there is a glitch in lsb-release:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939733
> 
> We could revert the change in lsb-release so that it looks at
> /etc/debian_version again, but we could also do the change
> in base-files now and fix this glitch in the most standard way.
> 
> So: Would you approve that base-files 10.3+deb10u2 for Debian 10.2
> has VERSION_ID="10.2" in /etc/os-release (and 10.x from now on)
> instead of "10"?

To confirm, is the proposal to end up with:

PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)"
NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
VERSION_ID="10.2"
VERSION="10 (buster)"

?

Regards,

Adam

Reply via email to