On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 05:21:21PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > [sorry for the dupe, hit send by mistake :(] > > On 2019-11-24 12:13:20, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > On 2019-11-23 18:34:25, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> I'm a bit uneasy about a blanket "include all", to be honest. It's > >> probably harmless since it's all coming straight out of debootstrap, but > >> I'd have been happier with something like "include security.*" if that's > >> what we expect to see. > > > > What kind of problems would you expect with including too many ACLs? > > I'm still curious to hear what kind of problems you expect here. I've > been running this patch in production for months now and would really > like to see this land in buster (and hopefully stretch next). > I don't know, that's kind of the point. For changes in stable I tend to err on the side of "if there's no demonstrated need for a change then it shouldn't be done". Things like "because why not" tend to be red flags.
Cheers, Julien
