On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 05:21 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote: > > The whole fix involes two parts: a part goes to src:zfs-linux and the > > other goes to src:spl-linux. Now that the updated src:spl-linux is > > already uploaded, and I'm now asking for the permission to upload the > > updated src:zfs-linux. Which includes two upstream commits fixing > > potential deadlock issues. > > What happens if a user tries using the current spl-dkms with the newer > zfs-dkms, or vice versa?
I forgot to add Depends: spl-dkms (>= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s-p-u) into the debdiff of zfs-linux. Actually zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, buster) have no problem to build atop spl-linux (= 0.7.12-2, buster) or (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s-p-u); while zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u2, s-p-u) will FTBFS atop spl-linux (= 0.7.12-2, buster) In that sense we'd better deal with spl-linux and zfs-linux synchronously. > Regards, > > Adam
