Your message dated Sat, 09 May 2020 11:53:52 +0100
with message-id 
<fd7fa4d56896c35aab49a5a51cb69727dc60e87a.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests included in 10.4 point release
has caused the Debian Bug report #950547,
regarding buster-pu: package mew-beta/7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228-1+deb10u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
950547: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950547
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: [email protected]
Usertags: pu

Hi, the release team,

I'd like to update package mew-beta in buster to fix a security issue,
managed as no advisory by the security team.

See this changelog and the attached debdiff.

mew-beta (7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium

  * New patch 070_checkhost.patch to enable checkHost for stunnel
    (closes: #950412)

 -- Tatsuya Kinoshita <[email protected]>  Sun, 02 Feb 2020 18:43:08 +0900

Please let me know if I can upload it.

Thanks,
--
Tatsuya Kinoshita
diffstat for mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228 mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228

 changelog                   |    7 +++++++
 patches/070_checkhost.patch |   15 +++++++++++++++
 patches/series              |    1 +
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff -Nru mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/changelog 
mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/changelog
--- mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/changelog     2019-02-28 
20:45:20.000000000 +0900
+++ mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/changelog     2020-02-02 
18:43:08.000000000 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mew-beta (7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+  * New patch 070_checkhost.patch to enable checkHost for stunnel
+    (closes: #950412)
+
+ -- Tatsuya Kinoshita <[email protected]>  Sun, 02 Feb 2020 18:43:08 +0900
+
 mew-beta (7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream version 7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228
diff -Nru mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/070_checkhost.patch 
mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/070_checkhost.patch
--- mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/070_checkhost.patch   
1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
+++ mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/070_checkhost.patch   
2020-02-01 22:10:00.000000000 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Subject: Enable checkHost for stunnel
+Origin: upstream, 
https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/Mew/commit/8de0a1398f10d0e8da29ce91ec22af17430c0004
+Bug: https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/Mew/pull/133
+
+--- a/mew-ssl.el
++++ b/mew-ssl.el
+@@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ insert no extra text.")
+       (if mew-ssl-unixlike
+           (insert "pid=\n"))
+       (insert (format "verify=%d\n" (mew-ssl-verify-level case)))
++      (if (> (mew-ssl-verify-level case) 0)
++          (insert (format "checkHost=%s\n" server)))
+       (if mew-ssl-unixlike
+           (insert "foreground=yes\n"))
+       (insert "debug=debug\n")
diff -Nru mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/series 
mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/series
--- mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/series        2019-01-06 
00:28:09.000000000 +0900
+++ mew-beta-7.0.50~6.8+0.20190228/debian/patches/series        2020-02-01 
22:16:29.000000000 +0900
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
 020_netpbm.patch
 030_cache-long-scans.patch
 040_incm-lock.patch
+070_checkhost.patch
 900_changes.patch

Attachment: pgp3zdPR8P8q7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Version: 10.4

Hi,

Each of the uploads referred to by these bugs was included in today's
stable point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to