Your message dated Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:39:59 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#961836: transition: openbabel
has caused the Debian Bug report #961836,
regarding transition: openbabel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
961836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to request a transition slot for openbabel (experimental ->
unstable). Current ben tracker [1] is fine.
Transition affects two packages in testing: v-sim and xdrawchem. They
build successfully without patching, thus binNMUing them will be sufficient.
Best,
Andrius
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openbabel.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2020-05-30 08:17:10 +0300, [email protected] wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to request a transition slot for openbabel (experimental ->
> unstable). Current ben tracker [1] is fine.
>
> Transition affects two packages in testing: v-sim and xdrawchem. They
> build successfully without patching, thus binNMUing them will be sufficient.
openbabel and the binNMus migrated.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
