On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 18:05 +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > Quack, > > On 2020-06-16 04:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > We're now planning for the final point release for stretch before > > it moves to LTS support. Is this still something that you're > > (either of you) interested in fixing for stretch? > > Thanks for reaching out. > > Since a removal request was pushed forcefully I assumed it would > affect all suites.
No, removal from unstable only affects that suite, and subsequently testing. For (old)stable, separate removal requests are needed. The package wasn't in testing at the point of the buster release, so isn't in stable, but is currently still in oldstable (and jessie, aka oldoldstable, but that's entirely unchangeable and will be archived soon). > Anyway I see no point in fixing the package instead of removal at > this stage, unless this is impossible to undesirable for the release > of course. That's entirely your choice. I'll convert this request to a removal from oldstable, but if you do decide that you'd like to update it instead then please let us know ASAP. Regards, Adam
