Hi Jochen On 2020-07-01 11:29:53 +0200, jspri...@debian.org wrote: > * Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> [2020-07-01 11:22]: > > > > * Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> [2020-06-28 22:58]: > > > > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > > > > > > > > > > > ros-roscpp-core > > > > > > ros-ros-comm > > > > > > ros-geometric-shapes > > > > > > ros-urdf > > > > > > ros-interactive-markers > > > > > > ros-actionlib > > > > > > ros-geometry2 > > > > > > ros-vision-opencv > > > > > > > > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > > > > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) > > > > > > > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? > > > > > > > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail). > > > > > > Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the > > > uploads to unstable. > > > > The binNMus for mrpt (#964044) and ros-rviz failed. Could you please > > take a look at ros-rviz? > > ros-rviz got stuck in NEW and I didn't notice when testing, sorry. I pinged > ftp-masters and will backport the fix tonight, otherwise.
Thanks! > Fun fact, mrpt compiled fine for me locally. The failure appears to be caused by a flaky test. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature