Hi Jochen

On 2020-07-01 11:29:53 +0200, jspri...@debian.org wrote:
> * Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> [2020-07-01 11:22]:
> > > > * Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> [2020-06-28 22:58]:
> > > > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ros-roscpp-core
> > > > > > ros-ros-comm
> > > > > > ros-geometric-shapes
> > > > > > ros-urdf
> > > > > > ros-interactive-markers
> > > > > > ros-actionlib
> > > > > > ros-geometry2
> > > > > > ros-vision-opencv
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time?
> > > > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions?
> > > >
> > > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail).
> > > 
> > > Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the
> > > uploads to unstable.
> > 
> > The binNMus for mrpt (#964044) and ros-rviz failed. Could you please
> > take a look at ros-rviz?
> 
> ros-rviz got stuck in NEW and I didn't notice when testing, sorry. I pinged
> ftp-masters and will backport the fix tonight, otherwise.

Thanks!

> Fun fact, mrpt compiled fine for me locally.

The failure appears to be caused by a flaky test.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to