Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2020 08:41:17 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#968065: nmu: libheif_1.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #968065,
regarding nmu: libheif_1.6.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
968065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libheif_1.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libjpeg-turbo that has
bug 966409 fixed"
Package: libheif-examples
Depends: ..., libjpeg62-turbo (>= 2.0.2), ...
Due to #966409 this misses the epoch, and the dependency
could wrongly be fulfilled by the buster libjpeg62-turbo.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2020-08-07 22:26:54 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu libheif_1.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libjpeg-turbo that
> has bug 966409 fixed"
>
>
> Package: libheif-examples
> Depends: ..., libjpeg62-turbo (>= 2.0.2), ...
>
> Due to #966409 this misses the epoch, and the dependency
> could wrongly be fulfilled by the buster libjpeg62-turbo.
Scheduled.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
