Your message dated Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:36:55 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#968374: transition: proftpd-dfsg
has caused the Debian Bug report #968374,
regarding transition: proftpd-dfsg
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
968374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968374
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition

This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is
not caught caught automatically since it is a virtual package name that
has changed.

Ben file:

title = "proftpd-dfsg";
is_affected = .depends ~ /proftpd-abi-/;
is_good = .depends ~ /proftpd-abi-1.3.7a/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /proftpd-abi-1.3.6c/;

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_GB.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2020-08-14 09:48:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2020-08-13 22:04:23 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is
> > not caught caught automatically since it is a virtual package name that
> > has changed.
> 
> I've scheduled binNMUs for the reverse dependencies. Once
> proftpd-mod-vroot is old enough, proftpd-dfsg should be able to
> migrate.

proftpd-dfsg | 1.3.7a-1         | testing        | source

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to