Your message dated Sun, 4 Oct 2020 16:55:30 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#968328: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #968328,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
968328: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968328
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a
relatively small transition, with only 2 source packages affected
(tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results
are as follows):
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
Ben file:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gloox.html is accurate.
Regards,
Vincent
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2020-08-12 19:51:37 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a
> relatively small transition, with only 2 source packages affected
> (tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results
> are as follows):
>
> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
>
> Ben file:
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gloox.html is accurate.
Closing, since this transition already finished a while ago.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
