Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2021 20:49:22 +0200
with message-id <71009aa6-a9f0-2ff6-6328-9b9433059...@debian.org>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#987776: unblock: bind9/1:9.16.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #987776,
regarding unblock: bind9/1:9.16.15-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
987776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package bind9
[ Reason ]
Upstream security release update of the bind9 package.
[ Impact ]
3 grave security issues would affect users.
[ Tests ]
Upstream has extensive unit and system test suite.
[ Risks ]
(Discussion of the risks involved. E.g. code is trivial or
complex, key package vs leaf package, alternatives available.)
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
[ Other info ]
Patches to put limits on NSEC3 SHA1 iterations according to the I-D
draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance were pulled into the package.
unblock bind9/1:9.16.15-1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Ac5X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
bind9_9.16.15-1.debdiff.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks, closing the bug now.
Paul
On 17-05-2021 20:38, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Missed the Cc: to BTS first time.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
